Tudor re-invention, leading to the quintessential Shakespearean portrayal of "we happy few", has been the most influential, but every century has made its own accretions. He considered a knight in the best-quality steel armour invulnerable to an arrow on the breastplate or top of the helmet, but vulnerable to shots hitting the limbs, particularly at close range. This head-lowered position restricted their breathing and their vision. [135] The battle also forms a central component of the 2019 Netflix film The King. The brunt of the battle had fallen on the Armagnacs and it was they who suffered the majority of senior casualties and carried the blame for the defeat. A BBCNews Magazinereportsimilarlytracesthe gesture back toAncient Greek philosophers ( here ). Since pluck yew is rather difficult to say, like pheasant mother plucker, which is who you had to go to for the feathers used on the arrows for the longbow, the difficult consonant cluster at the beginning has gradually changed to a labiodental fricative f, and thus the words often used in conjunction with the one-finger salute are mistakenly thought to have something to do with an intimate encounter. Turning to our vast classical library, we quickly turn up three references. [93] In all, around 6,000 of their fighting men lay dead on the ground. Without the middle finger it would be impossible to draw the renowned English longbow and therefore they would be incapable of fighting in the future. Before the Battle of Agincourt in 1415, the French, anticipating victory over the English, proposed to cut off the middle finger of all captured soldiers. French chroniclers agree that when the mounted charge did come, it did not contain as many men as it should have; Gilles le Bouvier states that some had wandered off to warm themselves and others were walking or feeding their horses. The French could not cope with the thousands of lightly armoured longbowmen assailants (who were much less hindered by the mud and weight of their armour) combined with the English men-at-arms. And for a variety of reasons, it made no military sense whatsoever for the French to capture English archers, then mutilate them by cutting off their fingers. In Gestures: Their Origins and Distribution, Desmond Morris and colleagues note that the digitus infamis or digitus impudicus (infamous or indecent finger) is mentioned several times in the literature of ancient Rome. It established the legitimacy of the Lancastrian monarchy and the future campaigns of Henry to pursue his "rights and privileges" in France. They were successful for a time, forcing Henry to move south, away from Calais, to find a ford. 42 Share 3.9K views 4 years ago There is an old story that allegedly gives the background of how we came to use the middle finger as an insult along with the alleged origin of the "F-word". The army was divided into three groups, with the right wing led by Edward, Duke of York, the centre led by the king himself, and the left wing under the old and experienced Baron Thomas Camoys. [c], The English made their confessions before the battle, as was customary. [54] To disperse the enemy archers, a cavalry force of 8001,200 picked men-at-arms,[55] led by Clignet de Brban and Louis de Bosredon, was distributed evenly between both flanks of the vanguard (standing slightly forward, like horns). Contemporary accounts [ edit] Whether this was true is open to question and continues to be debated to this day; however, it seems likely that death was the normal fate of any soldier who could not be ransomed. [31], The precise location of the battle is not known. Read more about our work to fact-check social media posts here . The main part of the speech begins "This day is called the feast of . It took place on 25 October 1415 (Saint Crispin's Day) near Azincourt, in northern France. It. This battle concluded with King Harold of England dying at the hands of the Norman King William, which marked the beginning of a new era in England. When the French rejected Henrys substantial territorial demands, he arrived in Normandy in August 1415 with a force of about 12,000 men and laid siege to the city of Harfleur. During this battle, the medieval archers started ahead of the army and commenced the action. [126], Shakespeare's depiction of the battle also plays on the theme of modernity. Henry would marry Catherine, Charles VI's young daughter, and receive a dowry of 2million crowns. [62] Le Fvre and Wavrin similarly say that it was signs of the French rearguard regrouping and "marching forward in battle order" which made the English think they were still in danger. [77][78][79][80] Rogers suggested that the longbow could penetrate a wrought iron breastplate at short range and penetrate the thinner armour on the limbs even at 220 yards (200m). Without the middle finger it would be impossible to draw the renowned English longbow and therefore be incapable of fighting in the future. Agincourt. [133] Branagh's version gives a longer, more realist portrayal of the battle itself, drawing on both historical sources and images from the Vietnam and Falkland Wars.[134]. [85], The French men-at-arms were taken prisoner or killed in the thousands. [93] Entire noble families were wiped out in the male line, and in some regions an entire generation of landed nobility was annihilated. Battle of Agincourt. Although the French initially pushed the English back, they became so closely packed that they were described as having trouble using their weapons properly. A complete coat of plate was considered such good protection that shields were generally not used,[75] although the Burgundian contemporary sources distinguish between Frenchmen who used shields and those who did not, and Rogers has suggested that the front elements of the French force used axes and shields. The Duke of Brabant (about 2,000 men),[65] the Duke of Anjou (about 600 men),[65] and the Duke of Brittany (6,000 men, according to Monstrelet),[66] were all marching to join the army. If the one-fingered salute comes from Agincourt, as the graphic suggests, then at what point did it get transformed into two fingers in England? Loades, M. (2013). Please refer to the appropriate style manual or other sources if you have any questions. The English army, led by King Henry V, famously achieved victory in spite of the numerical superiority of its opponent. [34] The rearguard, leaderless, would serve as a "dumping ground" for the surplus troops. Jean de Wavrin, a knight on the French side wrote that English fatalities were 1,600 men of all ranks. The two candidates with the strongest claims were Edward III of England, who was the son of Charles's sister, and Philip, Charles's paternal . Although an audience vote was "too close to call", Henry was unanimously found guilty by the court on the basis of "evolving standards of civil society".[136][137][138]. [97] According to the heralds, 3,069 knights and squires were killed,[e] while at least 2,600 more corpses were found without coats of arms to identify them. 1.3M views 4 months ago Medieval Battles - In chronological order The year 1415 was the first occasion since 1359 that an English king had invaded France in person. The French, who were overwhelmingly favored to win the battle, Continue Reading 41 2 7 Alexander L [37], Henry made a speech emphasising the justness of his cause, and reminding his army of previous great defeats the kings of England had inflicted on the French. In the other reference Martial writes that a certain party points a finger, an indecent one, at some other people. [108] While not necessarily agreeing with the exact numbers Curry uses, Bertrand Schnerb, a professor of medieval history at the University of Lille, states the French probably had 12,00015,000 troops. The original usage of this mudra can be traced back as far as the Battle of Agincourt in 1415. This famous English longbow was . Probably each man-at-arms would be accompanied by a gros valet (or varlet), an armed servant, adding up to another 10,000 potential fighting men,[7] though some historians omit them from the number of combatants. Maybe it means five and was a symbol of support for Henry V? See here for a complete list of exchanges and delays. Didn't it originate at Agincourt? This was not strictly a feudal army, but an army paid through a system similar to that of the English. The ransoming of prisoners was the only way for medieval soldiers to make a quick fortune, and so they seized every available opportunity to capture opponents who could be exchanged for handsome prices. The battle occurred on Friday, 25 October 1415 ( Saint Crispin's Day ), near modern-day Azincourt, in northern France. [73] The mounted charge and subsequent retreat churned up the already muddy terrain between the French and the English. The English King Henry V and his troops were marching to Calais to embark for England when he was intercepted by forces which outnumbered his. On the morning of 25 October, the French were still waiting for additional troops to arrive. Image source The metallography and relative effectiveness of arrowheads and armor during the Middle Ages. Keegan, John. [76] Modern historians are divided on how effective the longbows would have been against plate armour of the time. Certainly, d'Azincourt was a local knight but he might have been chosen to lead the attack because of his local knowledge and the lack of availability of a more senior soldier. Despite the numerical disadvantage, the battle ended in an overwhelming victory for the English. David Mikkelson founded the site now known as snopes.com back in 1994. The latter, each titled Henry V, star Laurence Olivier in 1944 and Kenneth Branagh in 1989. Moreover, with this outcome Henry V strengthened his position in his own kingdom; it legitimized his claim to the crown, which had been under threat after his accession. [124], The most famous cultural depiction of the battle today is in Act IV of William Shakespeare's Henry V, written in 1599. This battle is notable for the use of the English longbow in very large numbers, with the English and Welsh archers comprising nearly 80 percent of Henry's army. The recently ploughed land hemmed in by dense woodland favoured the English, both because of its narrowness, and because of the thick mud through which the French knights had to walk. One final observation: any time some appeal begins with heres something that intelligent people will find edifying you should be suspicious. The legend that the "two-fingered salute" stems from the Battle of Agincourt is apocryphal Although scholars and historians continue to debate its origins, according to legend it was first. [74], The plate armour of the French men-at-arms allowed them to close the 1,000 yards or so to the English lines while being under what the French monk of Saint Denis described as "a terrifying hail of arrow shot". The middle finger gesture does not derive from the mutilation of English archers at the Battle of Agincourt in 1415. [104] Henry returned a conquering hero, seen as blessed by God in the eyes of his subjects and European powers outside France. [20] He initially called a Great Council in the spring of 1414 to discuss going to war with France, but the lords insisted that he should negotiate further and moderate his claims. [19], Henry V invaded France following the failure of negotiations with the French. Historians disagree less about the French numbers. In 1999, Snopesdebunked more of the historical aspects of the claim, as well as thecomponent explaininghow the phrase pluck yew graduallychanged form to begin with an f( here ). After the initial wave, the French would have had to fight over and on the bodies of those who had fallen before them. It is also because of the pheasant feathers on the arrows that the gesture is known as giving the bird. And yew all thought yew knew everything! [92], The French had suffered a catastrophic defeat. The basic premise that the origins of the one-finger gesture and its association with the profane word "fuck" were an outgrowth of the 1415 battle between French and English forces at Agincourt is simple enough to debunk. [106] This lack of unity in France allowed Henry eighteen months to prepare militarily and politically for a renewed campaign. Thinking it was an attack from the rear, Henry had the French nobles he was holding prisoner killed. With 4,800 men-at-arms in the vanguard, 3,000 in the main battle, and 1,200 in the infantry wings. [45] A second, smaller mounted force was to attack the rear of the English army, along with its baggage and servants. The two armies spent the night of 24 October on open ground. On February 1, 1328, King Charles IV of France died without an heir. Soon after the victory at Agincourt, a number of popular folk songs were created about the battle, the most famous being the "Agincourt Carol", produced in the first half of the 15th century. The Battle of Agincourt (/dnkr(t)/ AJ-in-kor(t);[a] French: Azincourt [azku]) was an English victory in the Hundred Years' War. The point is, the middle-finger/phallus equation goes back way before the Titanic, the Battle of Agincourt, or probably even that time Sextillus cut off Pylades with his chariot. It was often reported to comprise 1,500 ships, but was probably far smaller. Henry V and the resumption of the Hundred Years War, That fought with us upon Saint Crispins day, https://www.britannica.com/event/Battle-of-Agincourt, World History Encyclopedia - Battle of Agincourt, Warfare History Network - Miracle in the Mud: The Hundred Years' War's Battle of Agincourt, Battle of Agincourt - Student Encyclopedia (Ages 11 and up). [48] On account of the lack of space, the French drew up a third battle, the rearguard, which was on horseback and mainly comprised the varlets mounted on the horses belonging to the men fighting on foot ahead. (Indeed, Henry V was heavily criticized for supposedly having ordered the execution of French prisoners at Agincourt. To meet and beat him was a triumph, the highest form which self-expression could take in the medieval nobleman's way of life." The . The English eyewitness account comes from the anonymous author of the Gesta Henrici Quinti, believed to have been written by a chaplain in the King's household who would have been in the baggage train at the battle.